The Third Biological Law of Nature provides clear guidelines on which tissues undergo cell proliferation during which phase.
In the vast majority of cases, this seems to hold true. Very occasionally, however, there are observations that call this into question, such as the following report:
https://www.disease-is-different.com/testimonial/74/en/hes-growing-now
The anterior pituitary gland produces various hormones, including somatotropin, which plays an important role in growth. A well-known conflict content here is “not being big enough to get the morsel,” meaning that during the active phase of the conflict, there is increased growth.
In this report, however, we see reduced growth with the conflict content “I must stay small to get rid of the danger.”
Is it conceivable that the conflict content driven by the old brain requires an increase in most cases (which is why we see growth in CA), but that a decrease is also theoretically possible, as in this case?
In the following new-mesodermal case (a lipoma), one could also easily imagine the opposite behavior (not translated yet):
https://www.krankheit-ist-anders.de/erfahrungsbericht/380/de/lipom-am-linken-oberschenkel-wegen-peinlicher-unterhose
Although the growth was interpreted as excessive healing at the end of the PCL phase in accordance with the rules, there was no pain, which would actually have been typical during the PCL phase when tissue is being repaired through inflammation. If the lipoma had simply grown during the CA phase to serve as additional padding, that would also be a plausible, biologically meaningful reaction.
Has anyone else made similar observations?
aktualisiert.
